These movie essays on
current releases are not for the thumbs up thumbs down crowd but for those who
want their brains teased with what and why.
Please join the commentary at the end.
By Dominique Paul Noth
Bruce Dern and Will Forte on the road in “Nebraska.”
|
There is no flash, bang and
crash of cymbals in “Nebraska.” It possesses a comedic yet elegiac elegance
that dooms it at awards time. But at
least the movie community had the courage to recognize its humanistic honesty.
The central character, Woody
Grant, is unlikeable and even pitiful – a taciturn, cantankerous, retired
mechanic muddled by years of boozing and bare subsistence in Montana. He’s like
American Gothic drawn by Charles Addams. In his partial senility and unfailing
stubbornness, he becomes convinced that a magazine sales come-on actually will
bring him a million dollars if he can get to Lincoln, Nebraska. Despite his family’s recognition that he has
been duped, he wanders off determined to find his own way. Only his least
successful son (as society measures success) decides to humor the old man and
accompany him on his fool’s errand.
“Nebraska” is a throwback to
an observational time of moviemaking. A
road movie, no less. In black and white, no less. With guitar riffs floating us
past signage, monotonous highways, side-roads,
decrepit houses and crumbling stretches
of rural America – without car chases or false punctuation.
How, you may well ask, can so
unpretentious a story about so unsteady a character keep us growingly
interested? But build it does. Chuckle we do. There is a sneaky comic vision
of the greed, boredom and buffoonery of the relations and old friends Woody
encounters, of how the neglected way-stations of America carry generations of
meaning. The son uncovers unexpected snippets from Woody’s past that quietly unravel
this uncommunicative beer guzzling grizzled wreck who lacks any interest in
defending himself or any ounce of poetry to reveal his soul.
Director Alexander Payne has
that poetry. When not being too clever, so does screenwriter Bob Nelson, who finds
humor in the articulate as well as the vulgar. It is through such skills,
including remarkable cinematographer Phedon Papanichael, that Woody
emerges. But the soul of Woody, without any
showiness, is occupied by Bruce Dern, and that is everything.
Bruce Dern was an uncredited
extra in Elia Kazan’s “Wild River” (1960), the sailor attacking a child in
Alfred Hitchcock’s “Marnie” (1964). The wild-eyed
cowboy who tries to hang Clint Eastwood (1968) and actually kills John Wayne
(1972). The suicidal combat victim of “Coming
Home” (1978). It took eons for Dern to
be elevated from psychotic and weirdo to offbeat leading man and then sought-after
character actor. But those who watched him maneuver over six
decades through good roles and bad ones understood what Hollywood often didn’t --
the artistry under the antic ability that got him cast.
No antics here. Finally a devotion to the truth of simply
occupying a character that had long been Dern’s relentless pursuit as an actor.
He never tries to push with Woody. He just is, and that is precisely what the
role needs – a natural hypnotic presence. Perhaps honor at his achievement will
break the awards lockout for “Nebraska,” but Dern fans shouldn’t hold their
breath.
There is one brief moment,
not Dern’s doing, where the film breaks its remarkable wall of observational
tension to satisfy the audience’s desire to strike out at those who take
advantage of Woody. But the fact that we
so want to strike out and defend a character we started out barely tolerating
simply emphasizes how Dern got Woody inside
our heads without artifice.
June Squibb as Woody’s abrasive
overbearing wife reveals more depth than the harridan we take her for. But even
better, since we see things through his quiet empathetic manner, is Will Forte
as the son. Yes, the Will Forte of SNL
who here finds the rapport with Woody and never lets us see him seeing the
humor of it all.
No, “Nebraska” won’t win
awards. It is too quietly paced and does
require attentive patient viewing. But it steadily catches you up, reels you in
and reminds you forcibly of the insights possible through humanistic cinema.
The author was film
and drama critic, then senior editor for features at The Milwaukee Journal,
then a leader in online news forums and editor for a decade of the Milwaukee
Labor Press. He now writes regularly for several publications on politics and
culture, including occasional theater reviews and Milwaukee historical pieces
at thirdcoastdaily.
No comments:
Post a Comment